DSAN 5450: Data Ethics and Policy
Spring 2024, Georgetown University
Wednesday, April 10, 2024
Below Expectations |
"This algorithm is unfair" |
Meets Expectations |
"This algorithm violates the Predictive Parity criterion of fairness when run on this dataset" |
Exceeds Expectations |
"This algorithm violates the Predictive Parity criterion when run on this dataset, but that’s because [other mitigating factor]. It still satisfies Within-\(\varepsilon\) Predictive Parity, for \(\varepsilon = 0.02\)" |
Doing Too Much |
All of the above, plus I developed a new better algorithm that is more fair |
Below Expectations |
"This policy is bad" |
Meets Expectations |
"This policy is bad bc it's biased towards [group 1], and doesn't take sufficient account of the welfare of [group 2]" |
Exceeds Expectations |
"This policy is bad bc it's biased towards [group 1], and doesn't take sufficient account of the welfare of [group 2], which violates the Rawlsian notion of what would be chosen by rational agents behind a 'veil of ignorance'" |
Doing Too Much |
"This policy is bad bc the inferred welfare weights \(\omega_i\) are \(0.1632\) off from the optimal welfare weights \(\omega_i^*\)" |
Hofstadter’s Law (Paraphrase)
The pieces of your DSAN final project will take longer than you expect, even if you take Hofstadter’s Law into account
I lean my hand on the seat but pull it back hurriedly: it exists. This thing I’m sitting on, leaning my hand on, is called a seat. They made it purposely for people to sit on, they took leather, springs and cloth, they went to work with the idea of making a seat and when they finished, that was what they had made. They carried it here, into this car and the car is now rolling and jolting with its rattling windows, carrying this red thing in its bosom. I murmur: “It’s a seat,” a little like an exorcism. But the word stays on my lips: it refuses to go and put itself on the thing. It stays what it is, with its red plush, thousands of little red paws in the air, all still, little dead paws…
Black people in America are […] born with a veil […] in this American world—a world which yields him no true self-consciousness, but only lets him see himself through the revelation of the other world. It is a peculiar sensation, this double-consciousness, this sense of always looking at oneself through the eyes of others, of measuring one’s soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused contempt and pity. One ever feels his two-ness—an American, a Negro; two souls, two thoughts, two unreconciled strivings; two warring ideals in one dark body. (Du Bois 1903)
We study race in the labor market by sending fictitious resumes to help-wanted ads in Boston and Chicago newspapers. To manipulate perceived race, resumes are randomly assigned African-American- or White-sounding names. White names receive 50 percent more callbacks for interviews. Callbacks are also more responsive to resume quality for White names than for African-American ones. The racial gap is uniform across occupation, industry, and employer size. We also find little evidence that employers are inferring social class from the names. Differential treatment by race still appears to still be prominent in the U.S. labor market.
DSAN 5450 Week 12: Project Talk, Causality and Identity Formation